Search for: "People v. Samuel"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
Some people gather there every Easter for religious services. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 12:04 pm
At Tuesday’s oral argument in Mont v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:43 am
My preview of City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
Electric Power Supply Association, the absence of Justice Samuel A. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Unicolors v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:17 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
Two current justices—Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor —worked as prosecutors. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:45 pm
Another one of today’s opinions, in Spokeo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
Only the Chief Justice and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
Monday’s argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
With Thomas in hospital, eight justices hear N.C. Republicans’ plea to intervene in voter-ID lawsuit
21 Mar 2022, 7:57 pm
In Berger v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:56 pm
On Tuesday, in Nieves v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
Justice Samuel Miller made this point many years ago, in his opinion for the Supreme Court in one of my favorite copyright cases of all time, Burrow-Giles Lithographic v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
And yet constant surveillance in the public sphere implicates some of the same concerns that several members of the Supreme Court raised in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Abbott, Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court (with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito concurring in the judgment and writing separately) that a state engaging in redistricting could create districts with equal numbers of people in them rather than equal numbers of eligible voters. [read post]
