Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 821 - 840 of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Such an exchange of views should be useful not only for scholars and policy makers in China and India, but also for anyone interested in other BRICS countries as well: Brazil, Russia and South Africa. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
All the studies show that most child victims of sexual abuse do not reveal their abuse until well into adulthood. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am by Frank Cranmer
One might just as well ban knives in the kitchen, scissors in the classroom, or the use of our hands outside the home. 2. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
O’Connor ran for the seat in her own right in 1970; she won and was re-elected again in 1972. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
He is famous for brilliantly-delivered, well-studied arguments during trial, and he received the highest possible score on the Florida Bar exam when he took it in 1970. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
” Against Nace’s scatalogical Jackson Pollack approach, Smith is silent about another plaintiffs’ expert witness, William McBride, who was found guilty of scientific fraud.[3] Smith reports interviews of several well-known, well-respected evidence scholars. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
’ Its most controversial moment, however, came before it even opened, in the early 1970s. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Multistate actions in recent years (they date to the 1970s) have several common themes. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 1:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This faulty reasoning shows up in the district court opinion in Salinger v. [read post]