Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
ApotexThe logic of this interesting provision is along the exact lines of the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in the case of Pfizer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm
The Superior Court had already determined Bill 5’s constitutionality. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
The first round of state-court appeals reduced that to $650,000 (or a 151:1 ratio). [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Dunson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Medrick v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
To us, the opinion on class certifications in Saavedra v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 11:21 am
Circuit’s 1990 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
C-273-17 (New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County 2018) (discussed here), the court enforced a fixed price buy-sell agreement among members of a medical practice where the original certificate of value hadn’t been updated for 16 years at the time of the plaintiff doctor’s retirement from the practice. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
General Impressions: USPAP, Nichols, and the Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s decisions are the starting point for any constitutional issue. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm
Among other things, the counterclaim sought in Count V relief from TLC on a respondeat superior basis for its officers’ misconduct. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm
Among other things, the counterclaim sought in Count V relief from TLC on a respondeat superior basis for its officers’ misconduct. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996) ("if state-of-the-art scientific data concerning the alleged risk was fully disclosed to the FDA and it determined, after review, that the pharmaceutical manufacturer was not permitted to warn. . .the FDA's conclusion that there was, in effect, no known risk is controlling"); Kelso v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
Initially, on July 10, 2009, the Oladirans filed their Complaint against Suntrust Bank and two of its main executives in the Maricopa County Superior Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass’n, 493 U.S. 411, 424-25 (1990) (holding that even though private parties may petition the government to allow them to engage in anticompetitive conduct, an antitrust violation may occur if their methods of petitioning are unreasonable restraints on trade in themselves). [read post]
