Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 37,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Guest post] Bad faith or business-savvy? Lessons from recent EU General Court’s ruling
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
The Right to a Unanimous Verdict and the Jury Instructions in People v. Trump
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am by Seth Barrett Tillman
State courts examining similar state statutes have reached the same result. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
"#1 Brand" claim was literally false because of apples-to-oranges comparison
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Showalter on the Fixed Meaning Canon and Palmer v. Amazon
10 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Michael Showalter has posted Palmer v. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
Companies’ Online Recruiting Should Comply with Other State Laws
10 Jun 2024, 2:43 am by Marylou Fabbo, Skoler, Abbott & Presser, P.C.
 Baker v. [read post]
Human Resources News - https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 10 June 2024
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
The defamation trial was set to start next week, but a deal has now been reached between both parties, the BBC reports. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Will functional antibody inventions find new life in the US with mean-plus-function claims? (Ex parte Chamberlain, Appeal No. 2022-001944)
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
New Antitrust Cases and Statements of Interests About Algorithmic Collusion
9 Jun 2024, 9:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Duffy v. [read post]
The Antitrust Attorney Blog - http://www.theantitrustattorney.com/
June 7, 2024: A SCOV Divided
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Andrew Delaney
State v. [read post]
Supreme Court of Vermont Law Blog - http://scovlegal.blogspot.com/
Who was NASA astronaut William ‘Bill’ Anders?
8 Jun 2024, 9:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Anders attended the United States Naval Academy and was commissioned into the U.S. [read post]
J&Y Personal Injury Blog - https://jnylaw.com/blog/
Seventh Circuit: Please Don’t Use the “Twilight Zone” Font in Briefs Ever Again
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am by Kevin
AsymaDesign v. [read post]
Lowering the Bar - http://www.loweringthebar.net/
The UN Cybercrime Draft Convention Remains Too Flawed to Adopt
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Understanding this difference is key to grasping the potential impact and reach of the Convention. [read post]
Deeplinks Blog - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks
Are Executive Employees Protected Under Virginia’s Wage Payment Law?
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Holly
United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 530-31 (2004). [7] See Entergy Corp.l v. [read post]
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig Blog - https://www.dbllawyers.com/blog/
[Neil Siegel] The Collective-Action Constitution in an Era of Polarization and Animosity: An Elegy?
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
In McCulloch v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Required SEC disclosures and erroneous DNA evidence
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Although the state initially opposed habeas relief, it changed its position when the case reached the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; it agreed that Escobar’s federal due process rights had been violated and that he was entitled to have his capital conviction overturned. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Ninth Circuit Does More Damage to Section 230–Calise v. Meta
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm by Eric Goldman
Most problematically, California state courts have reached the directly opposite conclusion as this panel and instead held that Section 230 applies to contract breach claims in many circumstances, including an opinion this week from the California Appeals Court. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/