Search for: "Said v. Clinton"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2016, 5:57 pm
People v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:31 am
That ten-year ban was signed President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994 but expired on September 13, 2004. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:00 am
Korematsu v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm
On the surface, all that might seem to be at stake in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
For example, in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
In Buttfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
‘A different rule,’ as was said in Camfield v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
His final one for the day said: “9/11/2010 Int Burn a Koran Day“. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
It is the face of Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The CMA said it was considering whether the merger would create a situation that “may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition”. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:45 am
The bill passed both chambers and was signed into law by Bill Clinton in February 1996. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
But there is more to be said in its defense than just that. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
Washington Post – Marc Fisher and David Nakamura | Published: 7/12/2017 When Donald Trump Jr. said “I love it” to the prospect of obtaining damaging information from friendly Russians about Hillary Clinton in June of last year, did that constitute a smoking gun? [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
I said in that piece that US military lawyers, in my personal experience with them, in fact had quite a burning moral vision of the laws of war and their meaning, and that US interests would be furthered if they were willing to argue more directly from moral propositions just as the NGOs do. [read post]
