Search for: "See v. See"
Results 821 - 840
of 122,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
However, the court should not have awarded the petitioner the ultimate relief sought in the petition, since the respondents had not yet filed an answer or the administrative record (see CPLR 7804[f]; Matter of O'Hara v Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
However, the court should not have awarded the petitioner the ultimate relief sought in the petition, since the respondents had not yet filed an answer or the administrative record (see CPLR 7804[f]; Matter of O'Hara v Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
I can tell you that in my week in Israel, I did not see a single Palestinian flag. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Sheetz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:54 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm
The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm
In Valent v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm
(See Bowie v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:27 pm
" And now we see something similar in a high-profile case arising out of the anti-Israel protests, Doe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
See Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 12:26 pm
Hot Girl Walk LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 11:55 am
See MB Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am
See also Mapp v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:03 am
v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In Woodruff v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
See ante, at 22, n. 5. [read post]