Search for: "State v. Born" Results 821 - 840 of 4,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2009, 9:57 am
  The court stated that from a public policy perspective the financial burden of this type of care should be borne by the tortfeasor and not the state or the chilld's parents. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm by Viking
I mentioned a report the other delay that United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 5:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In support of staying the case, the Court noted that its conclusion was supported by Mach Mining v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm by Mark Ashton
The implications can be said to be national in scope as individual states step forward with their own interpretations of  Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:20 am by Liisa Speaker
Using the intent of Obergefell v Hodges, 15 S Ct 2584, he would expand the equitable parent doctrine to include situations where the couples were prevented by state law from marrying but lived together as a married couple and raised the child as co-parents. [read post]
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:54 pm by Zachary Spilman
The NMCCA recently issued an unpublished per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Mr Robinson’s son was born in July 2015 and further representations were made but again the decision-maker concluded that deportation would not breach art 8 and also that the further submissions did not amount to a fresh claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 7:01 am
Some say it is further evidence that West Virginia is an anti-business jurisdiction, but others say this is a big business v. big business case (and it is, to a degree).The AP reports here and the Roanoke paper reports here that the Virginia Supreme Court is taking an appeal of the Highland County wind farm decision by the State Corporation Commission to grant the permit. [read post]