Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 821 - 840
of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
This initial request "for each City of New York employee who is currently employed in a position covered by a collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) District Council 37" [DC 37], the employee's name, office mailing address, job title, hire date, agency/department, work email address, work telephone number, and bargaining unit".DCAS's Records Access Officer (RAO) denied this FOIL Request on two… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
This initial request "for each City of New York employee who is currently employed in a position covered by a collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) District Council 37" [DC 37], the employee's name, office mailing address, job title, hire date, agency/department, work email address, work telephone number, and bargaining unit".DCAS's Records Access Officer (RAO) denied this FOIL Request on two… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:27 am
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
C. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:41 pm
C. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Wold, Peter B. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
John C. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
SCOTUS blog)C. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
Code, § 12838(a), (b)(1).) [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
Code, § 12838(a), (b)(1).) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
Under a federal law, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:43 pm
§§ 1342(b), 1344(g). [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
THE RECENT 9TH CIRCUIT BAP OPINION OFADINOLFI v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
They even went to some length to deliver a wide-ranging decision which makes several points about: a) free evaluation of evidence, b) the burden of proof for technical effects, c) the concept of plausibility, d) post-published evidence in the context of inventive step, and e) post-published evidence in the context of sufficiency. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:04 am
Gilmore v. [read post]
