Search for: "State v. Herring" Results 821 - 840 of 64,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Edith Roberts
She noted that the “Notorious RBG” meme took hold following her 2013 dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:36 am by David Markus
Judge Rosenbaum starts her opinion with a Game of Thrones quote. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am by Tyler Green
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:25 am by Shea Denning
  Raleigh police tracked down her killer, Jason Williford, through what then-police chief Harry Dolan called “gumshoe detective work”:  They collected and tested trash discarded by […] [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Being on the State or a participating employer’s payroll determines eligibility for member service credit in the State's Employees' Retirement SystemMatter of Muccia v DiNapoli, 2010 NY Slip Op 00630, Decided and Entered: January 28, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMargaret M. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In her merits argument, Bond urges us to set aside as inapplicable the landmark decision Missouri v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, June 24, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Crespo v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am by Kevin
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had… [read post]