Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
See Burwell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm
” These declarations alleged only “possible future injury” and failed to establish a substantial risk of harm (Association for Accessible Medicines v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
State Bd. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Due Process: Citing Matter of Sharma v State Univ. of N.Y. at Buffalo, 170 AD3d 1565, among other decisions., the Appellate Division concluded that SUNYsubstantially adhered to its procedural rules with respect to the administrative disciplinary proceedings involving Student and that the alleged violations of those rules did not deny Student"the full panoply of due process guarantees to which he was entitled or render ... the finding of responsibility or the sanction… [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Due Process: Citing Matter of Sharma v State Univ. of N.Y. at Buffalo, 170 AD3d 1565, among other decisions., the Appellate Division concluded that SUNYsubstantially adhered to its procedural rules with respect to the administrative disciplinary proceedings involving Student and that the alleged violations of those rules did not deny Student"the full panoply of due process guarantees to which he was entitled or render ... the finding of responsibility or the sanction… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:24 am
Samsung or Oracle v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
Apple and Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:23 am
We're still going to see spats over who invented what--but even more critical than IP ownership is the gatekeeper role that the major platform makers and app store operators play.The Fortnite maker's two app store cases were processed by the Northern District of California's intra-district assignment system, which simply picks the next available slot:Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Mayhew v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although advisory opinions have been prohibited in American federal courts since the late eighteenth century, several state supreme courts do accept requests for advisory opinions from state legislatures and/or the governor. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:58 am
One member pointed out that this is a revival of the old 1980s Skadden v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:42 am
App. 2013); and a loan maker's text messages seeking repayment of a loan—even though the texts also threatened that the loan maker would tell the recipient's wife about the recipient's affair if the recipient did not pay back the loan, Alter v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
Would a car maker have to warn about the risks of improperly stored antifreeze? [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
What needs to happen domestically for an active ingredient to be “produced in the United States”? [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 10:25 am
This could be her elephantState v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
The FRaft is designed to provide a vehicle through which the academic and civil society vanguard can effectively push the governments of developed states (at least those whose politics are to their liking) to project their law (under cover of the fig leaf of internationalization) into the rest of the wrld. [read post]
