Search for: "State v. Matt" Results 821 - 840 of 1,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 12:27 pm by mdkeenan
If you have questions about this or another related criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:13 am
(David Gray/Reuters) So held federal District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan in yesterday’s Zhang v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next month’s oral arguments in the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:29 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary supporting the two families challenging the mandate comes from Matt Bowman (who represents the Hahn family in Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
He specifically addressed our ability to address the two major strategic threats facing the United States: a rising China and weak, malevolent states. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Also media-related, Matt commented on the “spin” coming from these same two leading newspapers on the economic situation in Iran. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
 Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Wells previewed oral arguments before the DC Circuit in Abdullah v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:35 pm by Matthew Reisig
It was the subject of a statewide reliability hearing in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Holiday present: The ODNI released a “mini-trove” of declarations relating to  the administration’s post-Snowden use of state secrets privileges in two cases, Jewel v. [read post]