Search for: "State v. Michael A."
Results 821 - 840
of 13,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 9:36 am
" The New York intermediate appellate court rejected that logic (Matter of DiPerna-Gillen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
Hawks Dismissed * Michael Savage Takedown Letter Might Violate 512(f)–Brave New Media v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
by Michael C. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:45 pm
Wade”: Michael Macagnone of Roll Call has this report. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:15 pm
Michael Weingartner & Carolyn Shapiro have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, U. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
Judge Posner suggested something of this nature, positing in Gracen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am
by Michael C. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Stating the Facts Michael Hewitt was an employee of Helix Energy Solutions Group who worked on an offshore oil rig as a tool pusher, a supervisory position classified as exempt from overtime compensation. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 11:43 am
In both United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
In the most comprehensive iteration of the theory (which I dub version 3.0), Michael Newton argues that the ICC’s prescriptive and adjudicative jurisdiction is limited to whatever the State can transfer to it, meaning that a Status of Forces Agreement (“SOFA”) granting the United States jurisdiction over crimes committed by its troops in Afghanistan means that Afghanistan cannot “delegate” jurisdiction over U.S. nationals to the Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
As I noted in the Verdict column, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
