Search for: "State v. Murphy" Results 821 - 840 of 2,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
[Beck, Drug & Device Law and more; Jonah Knobler, Washington Legal Foundation] Money didn’t go into state treasury: “Oklahoma Lawmakers not so Happy About Purdue Pharma Settlement” [Sean Murphy, Insurance Journal, more] “Nevada AG’s old law firm can make up to $350 million on his opioid lawsuit” [Daniel Fisher, Legal Newsline] “List of firms handling Louisiana’s opioid lawsuit balloons to 17, including politically connected… [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:24 pm
At the Warming Law blog, Doug Kendall has this post discussing the impact of the Mass. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Employers have been sued for alleged defamation of an employee founded on postings made on the employer's web site as the decision in Firth v State of New York, 98 NY2d 365, demonstrates. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 10:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
If you wish for credits for other states, that is your responsibility to submit to your own state bar for approval. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Murphy answered a number of questions about appraiser liability yesterday, in Cabrera v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Murphy answered a number of questions about appraiser liability yesterday, in Cabrera v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
When making our Fourth Amendment inquiry, we must consider whether there is a “ clear indication’ that the intrusion will supply substantial probative evidence” (Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d at 297, quoting Schmerber v California, 384 US 757, 770; see Cupp v Murphy, 412 US 291, 295). [read post]