Search for: "State v. Prince" Results 821 - 840 of 1,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Acuff-Rose case, where the court explained that the more an unauthorized derivative work is transformative, the more likely such use is fair under §107 of the Copyright Act (p. 13).Transformative works can be mash-ups, remixes, fan-fiction, fan-made videos, or can also be works of visual arts which incorporate elements of previous works, such as Richard Prince’s CanalZone series which led in the U.S. to the much debated Cariou v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:52 pm by Lydia Estep
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am by INFORRM
In its judgment, SIAC confirmed that the Secretary of State was justified in determining Yang posed a national security risk. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Alastair Prince, Guildhall Chambers: Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB [2023] UKSC 15: on what is now probably the leading case on vicarious liability: we noted it here. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]