Search for: "State v. Stack"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Because the State could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling did not contribute to the verdict - the standard under the US Supreme Court's ruling in Deck v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:47 am
v=WeSBlXzxa5I. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is the official public record of the basis of judicial acts and of state interference with family life. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Consider a recent UK Court of Appeals case (Symbian Ltd v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:27 am
In Feist v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:33 am
The Court of Appeals reversed the WCC citing a 1955 Supreme Court case, Bagwell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
DYNEGY INC. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Read more… Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
He claimed that he did test a stack that was 6 mm in thickness and not 2.54 mm in thickness as his report stated. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
Derivative of What? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
He stated that "You don't need to fix the patent system - it's not broken. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
The comp system has been around for years, sometimes triple-digit years in most states. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
