Search for: "State v. Wallace" Results 821 - 840 of 1,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Hood, was convicted in 1990 in the fatal shootings of Ronald Williamson and Tracie Lynn Wallace, a couple he lived with in Plano, Tex. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" As I wrote back then:I can think of only two possible explanations for this odd and surprising move by the court: Either the CCA egregiously erred last spring by failing to accommodate Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm by Howard Friedman
However the court refused to dismiss his Free Exercise claim for damages because it read recent 7th Circuit precedent as requiring the state to show that it was using the least restrictive means when prison rules impose a substantial burden on religious practice.In Wallace v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:13 pm by Marcia Oddi
The ILB has two entries today that referenced the Supreme Court's April 2009 decision in Wallace v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm by Cal Law
Wenner, 351 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2003) (burglary is not a crime of violence); id. at 977 (Wallace, J., dissenting) (is too); United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
A few weeks back I discussed State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm by Marcia Oddi
Updatng this ILB entry from yesterday, Jan. 8th, about the Indiana Supreme Court's April 2009 decision in Wallace v. [read post]