Search for: "Texas v. New Jersey" Results 821 - 840 of 1,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 4:43 pm by Steve Matthews
New Jersey criminal lawyer John Marshall made several posts to his New Jersey DWI Lawyer Blog, including this one on the kinds of drunken driving, marijuana possession in a vehicle, and drug DUI arrests he typically sees in New Jersey. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  That lawsuit was pursued in state court in New Jersey. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
Thornhill has an extensive track record of successful litigation throughout the United States and, particularly, in the country’s federal and state court systems, including Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Minnesota, and New Jersey. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
FN6 The 21 states using the ‘50 percent’ modified form: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by On the Net
New Jersey Transit finally found a reason to fire a worker – burning the Koran. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
Plaintiff sought application of the law of New Jersey, where Defendant was located. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
]Then, in 2006, in the context of a Jersey bear story [ New Jersey's Jack the Cat trees bear ], IPBiz noted: In the last week, I had an opportunity to talk to someone about diesel soot, one of my favorite topics. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
 Additionally, the plaintiffs argued that the remedies available in New Jersey were not ‘comparable’ to those in Texas. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:10 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Hoffmann LaRoche Inc., ATL- L-8213-05, New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County (Atlantic City). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  Indeed, if the Court simply applies the language of the FAA, and doesn’t invent new rules of federal law for the purpose of wiping away state law, then the decision should not be significant at all. [read post]