Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
Texas invoked sovereign immunity to shield itself from suit. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:55 pm
From Judge Joshua Wolson's opinion yesterday in Alchem Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 3:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:43 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am
Stephen Bannon has defied the Jan. 6 Committee’s subpoena for documents and testimony. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Freedom of Information The Panopticon Blog has a piece “FOIA and security bodies: running sections 23 and 24 together” concerning the recent judgment in the case of FCDO v IC, Williams and Others [2021] UKUT 248 (AAC) The non-profit group The Citizens, along with tech advocacy group Foxglove Legal, have been given permission to challenge the decision to refuse multiple information requests about the use of messaging apps Whatsapp and Signal by government ministers.… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:22 pm
Guevara v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
Inslee, a challenge to a Washington state law that shields the personal information of in-home care providers from public disclosure but allows the state to provide that data to the union that represents the providers. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:05 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc., No. 20-cv-542 (M.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:58 pm
The Court in Domtar Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:02 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Three cases involving lawsuits over allegations that police officers used excessive force. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
Strain v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
Cohen* Texas’s Senate Bill 8 (SB8) is, to use a technical legal word, bonkers. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
Cohen* Texas’s Senate Bill 8 (SB8) is, to use a technical legal word, bonkers. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 8:19 am
It's Shurtleff v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:15 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ill., 871 F.3d 730, 744 (9th Cir. 2017) and Mathews v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
With respect to the earlier witnesses, the Justice Department explained that the extraordinary step of waiving any potential privilege claim was appropriate because the “question whether former President Trump sought to cause the Department to use its law enforcement and litigation authorities to advance his personal political interests with respect to the results of the 2020 presidential election” constituted an “exceptional circumstance” that justified departing… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am
Krause v. [read post]
