Search for: "United States v. Daniels" Results 821 - 840 of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 3:28 am by jonathanturley
Bray, the Chief United States Probation Officer for the District of Delaware, never signed off on the agreement. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 6-2 yesterday that in a case involving deferred restitution, a defendant must file a notice of appeal from the restitution order in order to challenge it. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Jon
In the United States, courts in general do not have direct line authority over armed enforcement agents. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  Prominent among the docketed cases is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
Palmer lays out the facts of the case pretty well: 1    Daniel (known as Dee) Snider is the lead singer of Twisted Sister, a heavy metal band based in the United States of America. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lee E. Berlik
” The court found the tweet was not actionable “because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
§§ 841(a)(1), 846”, Danielle Goding filed a motion to suppress “and all statements obtained as a result of a vehicle stop on I–87 in New York State. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
  The ITC complaint procedure is a favorite tactic by parties because in a relatively short amount of time, usually in a year or less, the ITC can issue exclusion orders which prohibit infringing products from entering the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm by A. Brian Albritton
The Blog of Legal Times recently featured an interesting case where a District Court Judge refused after the trial of a False Claims Act ("FCA") case to impose the minimum $50.2 million Civil False Claims Act penalty on the grounds that the penalty was unconstitutionally excessive in violation of the 8th Amendment:  United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]