Search for: "United States v. Joe" Results 821 - 840 of 1,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2022, 10:34 am by Katherine Pompilio
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman
Attorney for D.C. offered this statement: "On Nov. 8, 1983, the dignity and decorum of the United States Supreme Court—pristine for nearly two centuries—was shattered by the deliberately outrageous conduct of the defendant," was how the episode was described in a charging document signed by Joe DiGenova, the then-U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 1:13 am
No amendment of the Bill of Rights can be sacrificed lest the entire Constitution implode.)The 10th amendment recognizes that "powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution ... are reserved to the States ... or to the people. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:22 pm by Joy Waltemath
Citing management comments that an African-American detective “did not fit in” with an elite group of troopers and a white officer would “fit in better” as sufficient to raise an inference of pretext as to the real reason why he wasn’t assigned to that specialized unit, the Second Circuit vacated summary judgment that had been granted to the public employer (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
In his book, The Run of His Life, The People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
” Defendants would be permitted to petition the United States for permission to continue to participate in the JOE. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
And it is now my great privilege to introduce the 46th President of the United States, Joe Biden. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
‘In those cases, the FARA Unit will typically send a ‘letter of inquiry’ requesting further information, and the subsequent back-and-forth will often lead to a party concluding that a registration is advisable, even after the work has concluded.'” “Cravath said it was working for Zlochevsky ‘in connection with a possible investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and/or other United States governmental authorities,’… [read post]