Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS
Free: Rents on Stuyvesant Complex Units Were Illegally Decontrolled
Government
Settlement Agreement Terms Statutorily Protected; FOIL Disclosure Exempted Under POL §87(2)(a)
Matter of McFerrin-Clancy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
In the Amalfitano case, the Amalfitano's attorneys reference legislation promulgated in 1275.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to the Court of Appeals concerning the application of Section 487 of the Judiciary Law insofar as it provides that:"[a]n attorney or counselor who: . . . is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party . . . [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:19 am
” The SEC relied on United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
Costco slunk back to its pre-Quality King precedents and held that the limitation in Section 109 applying the section only to "works lawfully made under this title" meant 'works lawfully made in the United States.' To hold otherwise, the 9th Circuit implied, would be to impermissibly extend the reach of U.S. copyright law extraterritorially. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
The United States and Canada are continuing their meetings this week to try to hash out a bilateral deal in renegotiating NAFTA that would be not only satisfactory to both but also consistent with the bilateral deal arrived at by the United States and Mexico in late August. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
United States Miranda: J.D.B. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 2:58 pm
Padilla was born in Honduras but had lived in the United States for 40 years and was a legal permanent resident, even serving in the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTaxationTax Preparer Claiming False 'Hope Credits' for Clients Is Enjoined From Preparing Individual Tax Returns United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Court Explains Sentence Imposed After Guilty Plea On Indictment Charging Illegal Re-Entry
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
