Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 821 - 840 of 9,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Paula Black
United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number: No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European… [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number:No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design… [read post]
Case date: 10 March 2021 Case number: No. 20-10785 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ferencz Matiangai Sirleaf, Rendering Whiteness Visible International Decisions Julien Chaisse & Kehinde Folake Olaoye, United States—Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/R Faith O. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:31 pm
I had missed United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
From the humble beginnings in 2002 of sales out of the trunk of a car, Opposer has built one of the most recognized jewelry brands in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 810 F.3d 1333, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:42 pm by Sme
Moniz (10th Cir., December 6, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Moniz on Dye's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims because the undisputed evidence showed that Dye chose to retire)Labor Unions*United States v. [read post]