Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 821 - 840 of 9,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Paula Black
United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number:No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design… [read post]
Case date: 10 March 2021 Case number: No. 20-10785 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number: No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ferencz Matiangai Sirleaf, Rendering Whiteness Visible International Decisions Julien Chaisse & Kehinde Folake Olaoye, United States—Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/R Faith O. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:31 pm
I had missed United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
From the humble beginnings in 2002 of sales out of the trunk of a car, Opposer has built one of the most recognized jewelry brands in the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 810 F.3d 1333, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]