Search for: "Various John Doe Companies" Results 821 - 840 of 2,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
Sween Company, Serial No. 77048091 [refusal to register DELI EXPRESS SAN LUIS in standard character form for "burritos; snack cakes; and snack rolls, namely, sweet rolls" on the ground that the drawing does not match the specimen].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
His experience in international arbitration includes representing the company in disputes under the rules of various international and regional arbitration institutions and under ad hoc procedures around the world, and in coordinating the activities of outside counsel in domestic court and arbitral proceedings. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
Excerpts from various websites also showed tea and fruit juices sold under the same mark (e.g., SNAPPLE, NANTUCKET NECTARS). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:13 am by Miller & Falkner
Money does not bring a loved one back, but it may bring some closure and provide future financial stability. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:15 am
" [TTABlog comment: what does that have to do with the surname's rareness?] [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:25 pm
The complaint filed by the Marlboro Players alleges that the 11 anonymous defendants named in the suit, each listed as John Doe, used various screen names to post defamatory statements against both the organization and several named individuals. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:38 pm
Genentech Wants Bigger Dowry Playing coy, Genentech rebuffed an offer from Swiss pharma Roche to buy the remaining shares in the firm it does not already own for $43.7 billion. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm by Kenneth B. Weckstein
In what the court called a simple yet brazen plan, defendant John White’s company fraudulently bid for and won four government contracts set aside for veteran-owned small businesses. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm by Sunni Yuen
The Ninth Circuit has held that a stricter test for unmasking “John Doe” Internet publishers is appropriate when the speech at issue is non-commercial. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Schachtman
The NAS website does contain an open letter from Dr. [read post]