Search for: "Williams v. Cross"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Thus, generally, cross motions do not "'obviate a plenary trial of disputed issues of fact, where such exists; nor do cross-motions constitute a waiver by the litigants to such a trial.'" [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
MARUSICH v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
”[29] As few as twenty organisms have been said to be sufficient to infect a person and, as a result, possibly kill them.[30] And unlike generic E. coli, the O157:H7 serotype multiplies at temperatures up to 44° Fahrenheit, survives freezing and thawing, is heat resistant, grows at temperatures up to 111° Fahrenheit, resists drying, and can survive exposure to acidic environments.[31] And, finally, to make it even more of a dangerous threat, E. coli O157:H7 bacteria are… [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 7:53 am
Anthony Williams v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
If Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Organising things properly in this connection is important for both theoretical and practical reasons. [1] Some empirical studies are mentioned in P Cane, Atiyah’s Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 7th edn (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006) 59–60. [2] An illuminating discussion of several philosophical questions presented by the doctrine of contributory negligence is offered in K Simons, ‘The Puzzling Doctrine of Contributory Negligence’ (1995) 16 Cardozo Law… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
Also on cross-examination, Vacala was presented with a copy of his police report. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Drexel and William P. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
Read the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision.Nov. 7 — British Columbia — William v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
For example, in State ex rel Williams v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
When we speak of the new form of “dataveillance,” we are not speaking of the comparatively simple matching algorithms that cross check when a person’s name is submitted for review¾when, for example, they apply for a job. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
In a cross border setting it is therefore dangerous to speak of ‘infringement of copyright’ in a universal sense. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
If the party against whom the statement was admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party may examine the declarant on the statement as if on cross-examination. [read post]
