Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
Refunds may be available as a result of the recent United States Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 10:24 am
As a result, it was arguably harder for Justice Kennedy to make United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 12:17 pm
Staedler and J.B. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
The federal government’s view (after Windsor) is more complex. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
The Court's decisions in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:48 am
Supreme Court’s June 26 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Starger, A Visual Guide to United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
Until Justice Scalia in Windsor. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
More importantly, the Defense of Marriage Act decision struck down a key component of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:17 pm
DOMA's prohibition on forcing states to recognize out of state s/s marriage is intact, and left for another day (in my opinion this has always been unconstitutional).4. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Windsor (in part) and Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
From National Law Review: On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) struck down Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional in the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
In light of the Supreme Court's focus in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Windsor (Defense of Marriage Act) and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]