Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 32,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 5:58 pm
refusal to comply with a reasonable request 8. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Super. at 214 n.8. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:40 am
Nor does the FTT explain why it found that the respondent had given proper notice by his text of 8 th May. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 5:58 pm
refusal to comply with a reasonable request 8. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
As in Axel Springer, the Media Lawyers Association argued that Article 8 does not create an image right. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
United Kingdom (no. 35348/06) – Read judgment This ruling from Strasbourg sheds little light on how Article 8 can help adoption procedure, but it does illustrate how courts and agencies are having to square up to the deepening crisis in adoption rates. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
” 8 U.S. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Charges filed by Operating Engineers Local 2; complaint alleged violation Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
Anderson is scheduled to be argued on February 8, 2024. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
The first issue is sui generis to the DTSA (category 1). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
We conclude that in answer to Question 1 that a Judge may hold a social networking account that includes as “friends” any person who does not regularly appear or in unlikely to appear in the Judge’s court as long as he does not use the network in a manner that would otherwise violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:49 pm
The chart does not yield an easy answer to my question, but it does show that at least one frequently told story about extreme nominees is not true: a friendly Senate is no guarantee that a president will choose an extreme nominee. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:12 pm
Consequently, the patent is revoked pursuant to A 102(1). [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
That proposition is plainly correct.[4] The appellant asserts that A 77(3), in contrast to A 77(1) and (2), does not attribute responsibility for forwarding applications to any specific party and that the applicant has overall responsibility for observance of the relevant time limits. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 4:01 am
This interpretation gives effect to Canada’s obligations under art. 8. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:27 pm
If the application is not in condition for final action, and the response does not meet the requirements of 37 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:10 am
In fact, even as Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault claims that the bill establishes economic thresholds, excludes news services, or result in a billion dollars in new funding, the reality is that the bill does not specify any of these things. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 11:42 am
Here are the calculations: Employee 1—earns $11.00/hr Employee 2—earns $13.00/hr (1) $11.00 * 8 = $88.00 (daily wage) (2) Add $11.00 premium (3) $88.00 + $11.00 = $99.00 Split shift premium owed: $11.00 Total due for that workday = $99.00 [($11 * 8 hours) + $11.00 premium] (1) $13.00 * 8 = $104.00 (daily wage) (2) $13.00 – $11.00 = $2.00 (difference between hourly and minimum wage) (3) $2.00 * 8 = $16.00… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:49 am
-Section 8. [read post]
