Search for: "Matter of Modell (Modell)" Results 8381 - 8400 of 22,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Charles Rothfeld
Although we now associate Election Day with lines of voters waiting peacefully to perform their civic duty, that was not the model for much of America’s history. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that  varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
There is no point in denying this, and useful models have been developed illustrating that law is just one part of a bigger regulatory picture. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:25 pm
What is the standard of originality for copyright in works of applied art, and industrial models and designs? [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Likewise local councils: they decided matters of great public interest and importance, and it was the duty of the local press to cover them. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:22 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
  However, over Rimini’s objection, the jury trial was limited to processes Rimini used prior to February 2014 (thereby excluding any evidence of its “new support model”). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 1:10 pm by Joel A. Webber
It’s a matter-of-fact conclusion that this Silicon Valley company has learned how lawyers — their target market segment — views their clients: As adversaries in a zero sum game. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The court concluded that the only competing jurisdictions were those within the UK which were matters for internal determination by the UK Courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal also disagreed with the trial court’s findings that the FEIR’s composite emissions/”worst case” methodology for analyzing air emissions impacts, which was conducted in accordance with the harbor district’s protocol for criteria pollutant dispersion modeling, was misleading; it criticized the trial court’s use of an “unsupported hypothetical” to critique the methodology. [read post]