Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 8381 - 8400 of 8,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Charge filed by United Workers of America Local 621; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
It was estimated by The Chronicle of Philanthropy that $246.9 million was raised from donors in the United States in the first month following the disaster. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
  And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Pix credit: Marc Frank for Reuters) Even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
And it is now my great privilege to introduce the 46th President of the United States, Joe Biden. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:42 am by stevehansen
., mechanical inventions), the written description requirement does not provide much protection against overly broad claims, at least in the United States. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]