Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 16,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Smith, 424 Md. 294 (2012). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
Priscilla (Cilla) Smith is a Senior Fellow at the Information Society Project at the Yale Law School. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:38 pm
I send thanks to Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this Scott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm
McKinney v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
Smith-GreenMortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts--Tatro v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:38 am
This Kat congratulates and personally expresses his gratitude to Michael Edenborough QC (Serle Court), Shireen Smith (Azrights) and Mark Anderson (Anderson Law LLP) for the tremendous support they have given Gus and Inez. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 1:30 pm
(See Andrews v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:28 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
In such situations, the prosecutor may be relying on evidence that exists in the case, but characterizes it differently depending on what suits the prosecutor’s theory, even if the arguments made in both cases are mutually inconsistent (see, e.g., Smith v Groose, 205 F3d 1045, 1050 [8th Cir 2000]; Thompson v Calderon, 120 F3d 1045 [9th Cir 1997], rev’d on other grounds 523 US 538; United States v Salerno, 937 F2d 797, 812 [2nd Cir 1991],… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm
In Zeltser, et. al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:03 am
Which is what plaintiffs indeed request of the Ninth Circuit.But I also saw that the opinion was written by Judge Randy Smith. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
This past June, the Court granted cert. in Cline v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:19 am
Schurz v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm
One document that was generated but was out of my plan was “Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Frye-Mack Hearing” in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:21 am
In last week’s case (Lower v. [read post]
