Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 40,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
The second presumption, found under NY Penal Law 220.25(2) is as follows: 2. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 11:31 am
I will expand on this further in Part 2 of this column, to be published on Thursday of this week. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
No decision will be made next week, as the Supreme Court does not have its weekly meetings if there are arguments scheduled. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:58 am
., and DOES 1 through 100, as follows: Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and upon such information and belief allege, that at the times and places mentioned herein, defendants were the agents, servants, and employees of the remaining defendants, and each of them, and each of them were at all times and places mentioned herein acting within the purpose and scope of said agency, service and employment. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:25 am
If one does not reach down to a moral core to do the right thing when needed, then of what use are moral precepts at all? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm
It seems that Posner does not think much of diminished capacity as a basis for sentence reduction: Why diminished capacity in this sense (or senses) should be a mitigating factor in sentencing is obscure. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
Slip op. at 2. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Defendants should be attacking damages on summary judgment. 2) Apportionment of damages. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 12:03 am
Since when does a state institution threaten to litigate against the state? [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
"In contrast, DOT and Superferry argue that Act 2 is a general law that does not violate any provision of the Hawaii Constitution. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
(pp. 5-10)2. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:38 am
During Harold Koh's time as Dean, 1/2 of the professors hired were women. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:12 am
The trial court heard oral arguments on the motion on November 2, 2015, denied a motion for partial summary judgment by plaintiff in January 2016, and finally issued an order granting summary judgment to defendant in April 2016. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
The Creditors further appeal the bankruptcy court's order entered November 16, 2006, denying the Defendants' Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Judgment (the "Motion to Alter or Amend"). 07a0452p.06 Robert v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 1:53 pm
There does not have to be any forensic evidence. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 1:53 pm
There does not have to be any forensic evidence. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
[Cite to Doe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:36 am
The defense does have to show that there is a reasonable likelihood that this evidence would have made a difference in the trial. 2. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:02 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
