Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 8401 - 8420 of 10,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 5:43 pm by Mark Murakami
  As such, the Circuit Court erred in affirming the Chair's denial and the matter was remanded to the Board to decide the owners request for a contested case on their petition. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Kappos case, the most puzzling question in the case has become this: Why won’t the petititoners in Bilski fold? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm by Gene Quinn
That would make what Roberts said today true, and we would still have a case held over. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As a policy matter, it criminalizes agency costs better dealt with as a matter of state fiduciary duty law. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:09 am by Rick Pildes
But as Chief Justice Roberts concluded for the Court, the act of signing is rather obviously a form of political expression, even if that expression can also have legal consequences. 2. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
As next week’s confirmation hearings draw closer, the drumbeat of developments in nomination matters has quickened. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Renee Newman Knake
  PBS also has a segment with National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle explaining the decision (H/T Alberto Bernabe's Professional Responsibility Blog). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am by Lisa McElroy
In an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court acknowledged that the First Amendment was implicated in this case. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 pm by Jeff Gamso
  The reality is that the aristrocrats abused the peasants no matter what their assurances to the contrary. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
Even Justice Breyer confessed that he couldn’t come up with a meaningful test under Section 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
  The Board stated in a press release following the Court’s decision that it expected more than seventy pending appeals of two-member decisions to be remanded to it “[t]o decide the appropriate means for further considering and resolving [the matters]. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
Click on Robert Hefner’s illustration for J.B. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:46 am by Eric
Given the associated financial expense and diversion of managerial attention, I can't believe that Kauffman's suit against Roberts is a rational profit-maximizing move. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Kelly
Roberts didn’t have any substantiation for his donations. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
LEXIS 11299 (3rd Cir 6/3/2010) (unpublished)”[T]he Commonwealth contends the District Court improperly granted Gwynn’s habeas corpus discovery requests. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
Even if it wasn't enough that the SG (whose views the Court solicited) recommended the grant, the Seventh Circuit effectively sealed the deal in late April, when, sitting en banc, it unanimously disagreed with the Fourth Circuit's analysis, holding in a closely analogous case that there was no reason why the identity of the plaintiffs should matter under Ex parte Young. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:37 am by Todd Zywicki
The RBA’s conclusions are consistent with all of the other direct evidence on consumer card prices that I have seen, including the study by Robert Stillman that found that annual fees increased by an average of 22% on standard credit cards and annual fees for rewards cards increased by 47%-77%. [read post]