Search for: "Matter of Smith"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 9,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
A great example is Brad Smith, who joined Microsoft as in-house counsel, ran its legal department for many years, and was then promoted to President (beyond still being the company's top lawyer).Possibly the most important breakthrough for Avanci to dateFor Avanci, Daimler's decision to take the pool license is a breakthrough. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:10 am
See Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:30 am
She joined a national bar association for commercial lawyers and developed a substantial practice in insurance, shipping, and other business matters. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
The reality of the most notorious virtual currency is that it is only a matter of time before it comes under the purview of a regulatory body. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks | Actavis v… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
”Reiman later points out that “Marxism’s practical and partisan nature is what brings it into contact with moral philosophy,” and this, I think, gets to the heart of matters; that is, at least if we view ethics and morality (which is not reducible to a first-order morality of formal or structured propositions and judgments, be they deontic or utilitarian) as integral to what it means to flourish, to live “rightly” and well, to aspire to “the Good. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
Patent essentiality and validity are matters of judgment where different assessors will often disagree about what are ostensibly yes-no decisions. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Here, the prior acceleration was completely undone by a notice of rescission, and matters reverted to the status quo ante. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
Speaker Williams, who goes by his first name Rob, is often confused with Jim Miller, who has insisted that he is not in fact Speaker Steve Smith. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
Their argument was that it was money they got back from Buma and it doesn’t matter to them where it comes from, as it’s not part of the show’s settlement. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
We can accommodate five panels - we hope to see you there.Submissions should be made to Susan Smith susan.smith.hls@gmail.com Faculty Assistant and conference coordinator with subject: Money Conference Paper. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:32 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
As usual, I have to skip a lot of interesting presentations and I try to attend things I haven’t seen, no matter how good the ones I have already seen/read drafts of are.Session 1: Trademarks Jason George (and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette), Trademarks as Innovation IncentivesNot saying that the goal is/should be innovation. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
(3) The extent of the duty, or rather the reach of what is required to fulfil it, depends on the subject-matter… (4) …the judge must explain why he has reached his decision. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Merril Lynch, Pierce Fenner andamp; Smith, Inc., 532 F. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Even in the legis. history, Congress discusses White-Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:09 am
In this role, he is responsible for a full range of legal, policy, legislative, and operational matters affecting civil rights and labor state-wide. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
This post is by the Reed Smith part of the blog only. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
As a matter of history, Supreme Court Justices rarely lose retention elections unless they have written controversial opinions or if the court itself has recently been involved in some sort of controversy. [read post]
