Search for: "Parks v. State" Results 8401 - 8420 of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Kyle Kroll
District Court for the District of Minnesota held (ironically) in Paisely Park Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by Sheppard Mullin
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Infinitec Southwest Assistive Technology Exchange Network (ATEN) Adult Day Services & Programs 7550 West 183rd Street Tinley Park, IL 60477 Phone: (708) 444-8460; (800) 476-2836 (Toll Free) Fax: (708) 429-3981 Trutter Center Adult Services Program 3145 South 55th Avenue Cicero, IL 60804 Phone: (708) 863-1186 Fax: (708) 863-1189 Infinitec West Arthur & Mary Rubloff Building 826 South Addison Street Villa Park, IL 60181 Phone: (630) 620-4433 Adult Day Services… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Investigative website Open Democracy uncovered details of the Cabinet Office during  months of research for a report on the state of Freedom of Information. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 2:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J conducted a PTR in the case of Clarke v Guardian News and Media. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Commission has contacted EU member states to trace any Bluesky offices within the region but has not reached out to the company directly. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
An "existing parking lot" must have been used for parking vehicles at the time of application and for at least the previous two years. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Food trucks have become as ubiquitous on the streets of Manhattan as pigeons in Central Park. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:59 am by jadamengel
City of Columbus, 841 F.2d 1272, 1280 (6th Cir. 1988) (civil penalties for parking violations). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Professor Robert Leider (GMU) makes this point in a guest post: Many gun owners in California and New York will not be celebrating the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The obvious issue beyond the alleged negligence of the Park is the plaintiffs’ own conduct. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
He quickly summarizes how the state agency, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, acquired the cross and the land on which it sits, to help preserve it and to address traffic safety concerns around its busy site. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:15 am by New Books Script
Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2011 xiv, 176 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]