Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 16,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 3:05 am
For those of you interested in the patent component of “the useful Arts,” the Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:05 am
For those of you interested in the patent component of “the useful Arts,” the Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:27 am
Today, in Lane v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:02 pm
Judge Reinhardt waxes poetic in an opinion that's somewhat replete with tangents and that reverses a misdemeanor criminal conviction (resulting in a fine of $150) for insufficient evidence.Judge Murguia is fine with the result, but not the digressions. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:24 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 8:09 pm
Risk of workplace accident cited in OSHA fines in Massachusetts [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court defined in Vance v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
What the Chief Justice explained in the landmark Health-Care Cases (a/k/a NFIB v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 8:51 am
By Jacek Stramski The Supreme Court’s joint opinion issued Thursday in Masone v City of Aventura (SC12-644) and City of Orlando v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
Dichas agencias están protegidas por la doctrina que se conoce como el Third Party Doctrine [Katz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
Maybe Apple's infringement case was weakened by the concessions it had to make in reexamination, and/or it concluded that Samsung would be fine with a workaround. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
Meites, Chief Regional Civil Rights Counsel Region V – Chicago, indicated at a recent American Bar Association (ABA) conference that OCR’s last 12 months of enforcement activity will “pale in comparison to the next 12 months. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:08 am
Lanham Act (a very interesting decision that I finally got around to reading this morning – see: POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
