Search for: "High v State"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 35,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
The stakes in this case are incredibly high. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 10:42 am
F.T.C. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
The existence of the barriers was not in dispute, so the case will go to trial on the question of whether the cost is simply too high. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:53 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 9:07 am
On the facts of Calvert v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 5:40 am
In Town of Flower Mound v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
E, Moritz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
• Plans are available in every county in the states where they are available [ed: go figure].I checked with co-blogger Bob V (who's very active in the Medicare market) and he confirmed that the idea is legit.This particular iteration is intriguing, since the vendor, not the insured, is making the actual deposit. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In 1900 "the rule of one" was struck down by the high court as unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In 1900 "the rule of one" was struck down by the high court as unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 933 Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors([2019] EWCA Civ 852) The defendant was successful in the first three cases and the claimant in third The Supreme Court heard two libel cases: Lachaux v Independent Print [2019] UKSC 27 and Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:45 am
In 2012, the Ninth Circuit issued a strong ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:35 am
A recent case before the Human Rights Committee, Portillo Caceres v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
