Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 37,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
As is made clear by s3 Burial Act 1853, it is not merely unlawful it is criminal…”[22], although a faculty might be granted to inter cremated remains in a churchyard closed by Order in Council, Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 All ER 456. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am
As is made clear by s3 Burial Act 1853, it is not merely unlawful it is criminal…”[22], although a faculty might be granted to inter cremated remains in a churchyard closed by Order in Council, Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 All ER 456. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am
As is made clear by s3 Burial Act 1853, it is not merely unlawful it is criminal…”[22], although a faculty might be granted to inter cremated remains in a churchyard closed by Order in Council, Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 All ER 456. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
Reinstatement of applications under s.20A was brought in by the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004, and has similar substance to Re-establishment of rights under the EPC. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm
For example, in 2009 the Court held such a special session, to re-argue Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:28 am
Their actions will come in three "recommendations" to the board: fund the application, do not fund but allow re-submission or do not fund and do not allow resubmission. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 12:35 pm
(citing In re Carletti, 328 F.2d1020, 1022 (CCPA 1964); Power Controls Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
Boyfriend and girlfriend got married in 2010, but on appeal she says they’re no longer married. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:59 am
“There may be an offender who has a harsher pre-sentence custody, but that isn’t in the legislative framework they’re working with. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:40 am
T 301/87) was that there is no power to examine under Art. 84 EPC where the amendments creating the lack of clarity consist of a combination of claims as granted, the reasoning being that such amendments do not create any new lack of clarity, i.e. the amended claims are no less unclear than the granted claims which were immune from clarity attacks in opposition. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:49 am
But in recent decades, the value of the TANF grant has fallen dramatically. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:02 pm
The risks of militarizing the local cops are easy to see—and they’re compounded by folding local law enforcement into homeland security. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
But $3,500 or $4,500 a year for the whole marriage, even if (as here) they're married for 15+ years?! [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Quoting the Court’s earlier decision,In re Cuozzo, the majority reiterated that IPRs are “a second look at an earlier administrative” action, i.e., grant of a patent. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Otherwise you're depriving the trial court (as well as the parties) of its discretion. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:46 am
However, courts have allowed a plaintiff to allege a business expectancy with a class of individuals, as long as they’re specifically identifiable. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:54 am
You’re not alone. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
" In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 U.S.P.Q.2d 1938, 1939 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
Three new relists were granted this week. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
If you want to be able to sue yourself, you’ll want to make sure you’re an assignee and not an exclusive licensee. [read post]
