Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 35,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
You said to the judge you would uphold the law! [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
The Court of Appeal had held that the evidence emerging during the de Silva review had not been sufficient to revive (in accordance with Brecknell v United Kingdom (32457/04) (2008) 46 EHRR 42, [2007]) the art 2 procedural or investigative obligation. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Judge Cory, a retired judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, was appointed in June 2002. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:46 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:35 pm
(cite this case: United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Creative Compounds, LLC, the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, which had held that a series of patents owned by Natural Alternatives International, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:46 am
Hayes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 12:53 pm
The case is Philbrick v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:57 am
Hurd of the United States District Court for the Northern District in New York. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 5:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
In Cash v. [read post]
