Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 8421 - 8440 of 12,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
Not content with taking the tune, the British took Händel as well and then anglicised him by removing his umlaut. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
At that point, the charter proposed by the Convention and transmitted by the Congress took legal effect in the name of the People. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court has, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Officer Fenton transported Manriquez to the San Diego County jail where Manriquez took a breath test that showed blood-alcohol level results of 0.11 at both 12:54 a.m. and 12:59 a.m. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 11:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Relying on precedent finding that internet communications are not confidential (see People v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am by Mark C. Niles
Seventeen years after Monroe, the Supreme Court took a second swing at the issue of municipal liability under Section 1983 in Monell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:43 am by Ben
Take-Two Interactive Software, the company behind ‘Grand Theft Auto V’ (GTA V) has filed several lawsuits in the US and abroad, targeting alleged cheat software. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
Ericsson testified in TCL v Ericsson that it took 50 man-hours per patent to prepare claim charts. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]