Search for: "Secure US, Inc." Results 8421 - 8440 of 17,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
There was consideration for both parties and it was not a “take it or leave it” situation where the former employee was concerned with securing a job. [read post]
 Ironshore argued that the term “directly,” as used in the fraudulent instruction provision, required an immediate causal link between the fraud and the loss. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and accuses Tyson Foods of overstating in corporate and investor materials the priority it puts on animal welfare. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Citing cases in the Seventh, Third and Second Circuits, the Apex court held that the cost to Apex of complying with the injunction is not a "right to payment" as used in the Bankruptcy Code.  [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by EEM
Disasters Wiley Yes 24 months Yes/US$3000 European J. of Migration & Law Brill Yes None Yes/US$2800 Georgetown Immigration Law J. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
"At the start of our report, we declare five principles: it is in our national interest to make energy abundant, affordable, clean, diverse, and secure. . . [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 3:03 pm by zamansky
“For anyone who owns shares of CBS or Viacom, both controlled by Shari Redstone’s National Amusements Inc., Mr. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:57 am by Ben Vernia
The subcontractors using private security are alleged to have also violated subcontract terms requiring travel only in military convoys. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 11:07 am
(Perry) with securities law violations for its failure to report timely under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its beneficial ownership of more than 5 percent of the outstanding common stock of Mylan Laboratories Inc. [read post]