Search for: "State v. True"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 21,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 4:29 am
(See Milkovich v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
Healthnow New York Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Dist. of Middletown N.Y. v Civil Serv. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
At the date of the contested decision, the public of the United Kingdom was no longer part of the relevant public of the European Union.Finally, while it is true that the date to be taken into account for assessing the acquired distinctiveness of the earlier mark is the filing date of the contested trade mark application (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488), the fact remains that the requirement of permanence or persistence of the prior right at the date on which… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm
In an email to Law360 (paywalled, unfortunately) Professor Ryan Abbott (whose Artificial Inventor Project is the true driving force behind the DABUS patent applications and court cases) has confirmed that they ‘plan to seek leave to appeal’ to the High Court. [read post]
12 May 2025, 8:34 am
Collection Development, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:29 am
SCOTUS decided Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
Borel v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
Yet another IP judge called Richard :Richard Hacon - the new IPEC judgeThe rumors were true. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:43 am
True that, says the court in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 9:02 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:43 pm
In Cine SK8, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
Hilario v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm
At this assertion, Judge Sims asked whether any case law stating just that. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
It is true, of course, that there has been a debate under the motion cited above, and which was carried by a very large majority. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
This post discusses one of those.The recent opinion in Rowland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:15 pm
(See Lewis v. [read post]
