Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 8421 - 8440 of 32,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Specifically, it invokes the "major questions" doctrine – outlined by Justice Neil Gorsuch in dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
As is usually the case, the United States is the most frequent amicus group on the merits so far this term. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
Specifically, it invokes the “major questions” doctrine – outlined by Justice Neil Gorsuch in dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” Jack Wang reports at UChicago News that, “[a]fter more than a quarter of a century on the United States Supreme Court, what hasn’t changed for Ruth Bader Ginsburg are her cordial relationships with her fellow justices. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am by Patricia Hughes
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
  Protecito0n form unlawful interference states the obvious--and it adds little to the duty of states to force them to declare that they will do what they are constitutionally burdened with doing. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
(Plutarch, The Fall of the Roman Republic, Sulla, ¶ 31).In the West it has long been common for leaders of states (or those whose leadership guides the state) to establish proscription lists. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by James Nurton
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that an EU trade mark (EUTM) proprietor may bring an infringement action in an EU Member State where advertising or offers for sale are directed or located, in a case concerning alleged infringement of an EUTM in the United Kingdom by a Spanish defendant. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by James Nurton
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that an EU trade mark (EUTM) proprietor may bring an infringement action in an EU Member State where advertising or offers for sale are directed or located, in a case concerning alleged infringement of an EUTM in the United Kingdom by a Spanish defendant. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:59 am by Cristina Mariottini
Entry Clearance Officer (Kafala as a Prerequisite for Family Reunification with a European Citizen: The Judgment of the Court of Justice in S.M. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in  Perdue v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:44 am
The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of the United States v. [read post]