Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 8441 - 8460 of 76,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Eugene Volokh
[Appalling that an American university, which had publicly committed itself to free expression, would thus censor criticism of a foreign government (whether China, Israel, or any other).] [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
” It advances a proposal bolstered by five pillars to address the causes of migration in the region:  Pillar I: Addressing economic insecurity and inequality  Pillar II: Combating corruption, strengthening democratic governance, and advancing the rule of law Pillar III: Promoting respect for human rights, labor rights, and a free press  Pillar IV: Countering and preventing violence, extortion, and other crimes perpetrated by criminal gangs, trafficking networks, and other… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
The UK IPO’s decision Whittaker’s alleged, regarding the "gin" goods in Little Hare's application, that use of the application (1) would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character and/or reputation of its Hare Logo, and (2) would enable Little Hare Gin to benefit from its goodwill. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:42 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In United Parcel Service v Teamsters Local Union No. 213, 2021 CanLII 64789 (CA LA), we see the impact an employee’s trash talk about their employer can have on his or her potential reinstatement. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 10:53 pm by Donald Dinnie
In this recent determination of the Financial Services Tribunal, the Tribunal referred to the appeal board decision of 2003 in Hamilton Smith & Company v The Registrar of Financial Markets which held: “To determine where a person is ‘of good character and integrity’ involves a moral judgment. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm by llaird
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
§ 841(a); and (2) whether the trial court erred by not explaining or adequately defining “good faith” in its instructions to the jury regarding a Controlled Substances Act case involving a physician. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]