Search for: "People v. Story" Results 8441 - 8460 of 9,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The migration of credit card operations to South Dakota and Delaware began with the Supreme Court's decision in Marquette National Bank v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:09 am by Paul
If they do not, people will be frightened to make links for fear of legal implications. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:15 am by Andres
Update: Jas Purewal has informed me of a recent defamation case in England, G & G v Wikimedia Foundation. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The problem is that slavish copying of an accurate story is NOT a defense to plagiarism.The point of plagiarism is copying without attribution, not copying of false stories. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am by Legal Beagle
He is understood to have been heading for Union Street to tell people about Hollie’s case and his plans to contest the Aberdeen South parliamentary seat as an independent candidate. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am by David Bernstein
  This may be cold comfort to Sullivan and his defenders, but we might as well get the story right, and the difference is important for reasons discussed below. [read post]
Since every judge has a sexual orientation, every judge has a potential bias when faced with a case about discrimination against gay people or straight people. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
(Fear not: Notwithstanding the overall topic, this not a "Penthouse Stories" tale.) [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 am by Steve Hall
The DSM-V website is live as of today. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by Eric Muller
And this brings me to another strength of the book: Greg significantly expands our knowledge of the legal history of this era by his careful account of the litigation of Duncan v. [read post]