Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
State, 2003 OK CR 11, 71 P.3d 30, and Salazar v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
During a brief conversation, [Puesan] asked Lopez for [his] personal log-in and password for Time Warner Cable's billing and customer information system, CSG, but Lopez refused. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 2:28 pm
See Royer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:55 pm
The Court of Appeal issued its decision in Ellins v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
, the Texas legislature tried to one-up Florida with HB 20, its own social media censorship bill. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is all about patent law and how subject matter ‘relates’ to other subject matter, he explains. ***** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 34 [week ending Sunday 22 February] – Bill Gates goes to China | Ms Swift's issue with trade marks | TMs and jurisdiction for on-line infringement cases | UK's Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the EPO | Divani & Divani | UK first in global IP enforcement | SUEPO v EPO | Enterprise v… [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 9:34 am
Take Oklahoma’s bill, SB 1959, for example. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:25 pm
Problem 17 --State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
An example of the FSIA piercing the this immunity is the decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Malewicz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
Hayling v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
July 25, 2024) ; Council of Life Insurers v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
