Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 8461 - 8480 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
On July 21, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court in McNeil v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:13 am
Plaintiffs should not be excused of their Rule 23 burden to show at certification that questions of reliance are common merely because they might lose later on the merits element of materiality. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
Once the movant meets his burden, the burden shifts to the non-movant to raise a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:59 am
Continuation on the payroll for a brief period after the expiration of a probationary period does not automatically result in the individual attaining tenure by estoppel [Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612]. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:10 pm
On Monday, December 4, 2006, Judge Joanna Seybert adopted in part the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tracy Tomlinson issued only days earlier on November 30 in RX USA Wholesale v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It identified ten considerations in determining obviousness: whether at the priority date something was “obvious to try”; the routine nature of the research and any established practice of following such research through to a particular point; the burden and cost of the research programme; the necessity for and the nature of the value judgments which the skilled team would have; the existence of alternative or multiple paths of research; the motive of the skilled person; the… [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:37 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The burden of proof is on the consumer to establish a defect and a causal link to the injury. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. [read post]