Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 15,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
The only support for (a) in the complaint is a citation on page 21 to something the Court said in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:44 am
Swatch argued that the visual differences are clear and obvious, and that Apple’s marks are of low technical distinctiveness.The PAR acknowledged that in assessing mark similarity, the factor of “distinctiveness” is to be integrated into the inquiry. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:04 pm
The rising tide of digital device searches around the country prompted the Supreme Court in 2014 to decide Riley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
Susan V. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:44 am
COURT REFUSES TO CONSIDER ANTI-ABORTION DOCTORS’ CHALLENGE TO MIFEPRISTONE The plaintiffs in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:58 am
The case is Olem Shoe Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm
As the Supreme Court’s decision in Kerry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:53 am
Vásquez says that asylum-seekers are given no support from the Guatemalan government while their applications are being processed. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:48 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:54 am
In Singleton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
She argued U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
Nonetheless, the requirement of plausibility is still a “very low” threshold and different to the requirement of “fair expectation of success” in the inventive step inquiry - citing Actavis v Lilly[2015]. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:28 pm
Support for poison pills will also be considered if the threshold is not "unreasonably low", (i.e. lower than 20%) and the provisions of the qualifying offer clause include certain attributes. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
As I speculated in my previous post on Ericsson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Power VenturesBlizzard v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Viacom International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am
He said he was reluctant to push cases such as Gregory's into the tort system because that would pit "low-wage workers and ordinary families who are poorly positioned to mitigate risks or absorb the costs of injuries" against each other and that employers of in-home health care workers were in the best position to take on the risk of injury to workers. [read post]
