Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8461 - 8480 of 15,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2014, 10:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The court followed the much-criticized decision in Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:59 am
It squanders FDA resources by focusing on low-risk information-based applications. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
IBM relies on exclusions in fight with subcontractor Fujitsu Services v IBM [2014] EWHC 752 (21 March 2014) http://t.co/eESfUUdVlc -> Three Canadian experts on privacy | IT World Canada News http://t.co/W0RQZ4uBTo -> New anti-spam legislation could bolster Canadian privacy commissioner’s call for greater PIPEDA enforcement powers http://t.co/XWqehkPDZ7 -> Tough New Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation – Beware Its Extra-Territorial Reach http://t.co/vZ6Gz3uUmc ->… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 10:30 am by David Han
A few terms back, in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 11:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Interclick LinkedIn Beats Referrer URL Privacy Class Action on Article III Standing Grounds–Low v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by CJLF Staff
  Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The former employee Hauge prevailed against his former employer in a contempt/injunction case Energy Recovery v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The New York Civil Liberties Union announced the approval yesterday of a settlement in Lowe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:53 pm
The EPA regulations being considered by the Supreme Court in UARG v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:48 am by UChicagoLaw
On Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein takes a look at the recent Ninth Circuit decision Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]