Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 8461 - 8480 of 13,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 8:16 am by leXpeak - Author
Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449(1963), permitted the admission or entry into the United States of a returning lawful permanentresident if the departure from the United States was “brief, casual and innocent. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:04 am
United States v. 323 "Quintales" of Green Coffee Beans, 2012 U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by Steve Lombardi
Next we head over to Robins, Iowa (Never heard of it.) and a female driver on C. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm by Joseph I. Rosenbaum
Cabranes wrote: "We conclude that the District Court correctly held that the 512(c) safe harbor requires knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity, but we vacate the order granting summary judgment because a reasonable jury could find that YouTube had actual knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity on its website. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:15 am by Hull and Hull LLP
[b] It must be proven by clear and satisfactory evidence; and (c) it must include an agreement not to revoke the wills. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:24 am by sally
AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395; [2012] WLR (D) 106 “In looking to the question whether an asylum seeker, who had been a member of a terrorist organisation and convicted of a crime outside the country of refuge, fell to be excluded from the Refugee Convention pursuant to article 1F(b) and (c) thereof, one had to avoid applying a presumption of individual liability; and in asking whether the crime in question was… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]