Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 33,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Troy Lambert filed a putative class action, alleging violations of California’s false advertising, consumer fraud and unfair competition laws, arising from Nutraceutical’s sale and marketing of what it claimed were aphrodisiac supplements. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
Case Law Developments There have been some interesting developments since my December 11, 2018 post on the First Appellate District Court of Appeal’s grant of rehearing of its October 23, 2018 published opinion in Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Supreme Court decided Timbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
In one case (I believe it was an Apple v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am
Cartagz requested pursuant to 37 CFR 202.5(c) that the Office reconsider its refusal a second time, on the basis that the Office had applied a higher creativity standard than warranted by copyright law, that following Harcourt, Brace & World Inc. v Graphic Controls Corp 329 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:33 am
In this case, Biel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Transportation Agency (1987)), and treat pregnant women more favorably than non-pregnant employees (California Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:07 pm
And now per a new California Supreme Court case (Ward v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:29 am
In a recent ruling issued by the Southern District of California, Ewing v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:10 am
In Rotkiske v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
The CCPA is the first comprehensive privacy law in the US, but it was produced by a terrible process that resulted in a predictably terrible law that will hurt the California economy and much more. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
The primary precedent with which the court grappled is Rostker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 11:28 am
On April 15, the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am
This is true despite the fact that data overwhelmingly shows there is very little variation in the percentage of whites v. blacks who use the drug. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Additional Resources: Hernandez-Miranda v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 8:50 pm
In Canales v. [read post]
